so I work retail and standing on cement floors for hours a day can leave my legs feeling achey at times...think I should take an Advil every morning so I won't get achey if I'm not initially?
Probably not.
Long term exposure or extended use to an anti-inflammitory can cause, among other things, stomach ulcers. Use them only when you need to, right?
Okay, now, dewormers, such as Heartguard and Interceptor, are basically relying on this concept of "prevention."
If you give this product monthly it will keep them from getting heartworms.
Well, no actually, it will kill the worms if present (yeah, as in HAS) in the body (hopefully).
Plus, like any good parasiticide, little fast producing creatures (with high fecundity) like worms become resistant to it. Using them frequently (read too often), just like antibiotics, makes them less viable as killers.
So...
why pay for a treatment, that has known detrimental side effects, if it's not really even preventing?
Seriously, that's like giving your kid, or yourself for that matter, antibiotics monthly to prevent infection.
Showing posts with label smoke and mirrors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label smoke and mirrors. Show all posts
14 September 2010
heartworm...
Labels:
antibiotics,
dewormers,
dogs,
heartworm,
prevention,
resistance,
smoke and mirrors
12 September 2010
Breed Standards
Eugenics. What happened when people started believing in eugenics? The attempted "extermination" (read mass murder) of millions of people including Jews, Gypsies, Intellectuals, Handicapped, and the list goes on.
Where do "modern" breeding practices for dogs come from?
The same movement.
The same movement.
The concept of breeding for desired traits to aid humans in hunting, guarding, herding, and companionship took a nose dive with the creation of kennel clubs and, you got it, breed standards. As noble and logical as they present, to have a basis from which to judge an ideal structure, they actually are causing direct harm to our beloved friends.
If you have time and can handle it watch the BBC video, Purebred Dogs Exposed.
Humans invariably create little stories and quips for why grossly exaggerated physical deformities in dogs are advantages.
The Bulldog's wrinkled smashed bracchy face allowed the blood from biting bulls to drain away from its eyes. Really? 'Cause every brachy-faced dog I've met struggles with breathing, overheating and eating...you know, daily living type activities. And don't forget the usual gross buildup of bacteria in the poorly ventilated folds of skin. The evidence for these historical reasons? Depictions of bull-baiting dogs that looked like Pit Bulls with well-defined (read long) snouts and wide muscled jaws not to mention long athletic legs.
Or how about, a personal favorite, tail docking, especially in sporting breeds. The bloody tail argument of a dog scraping or breaking its tail while working in wooded terrain is ridiculous. My main evidence to the contrary (besides having a tailed spaniel that romps daily in the woods and competes in tracking)? Hmmm, Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers, Chesapeake Bay Retrievers, Flat-Coated Retrievers, Curly-Coated Retrievers, Irish Setters, Gordon Setters, Nova Scotia Dock Tolling Retrievers, Dutch Partridge Dogs, Münsterländers, Stabyhouns...to name a few. They all get to keep their tales in their standards. Plus, for those dog breeds out there where docking is considered a "safety measure", why pray tell are you breeding huge coated dogs with long feathering that catches brambles and burs and requires constant grooming?
Rather than breeding for personality traits and health breed standards and the all mighty holders of breed standards, the kennel clubs, push breeds further from these goals. Even the most dedicated breeders who have genuine desires for maintaining quality temperaments, confirmation (physical soundness), and overall workability are confided by the fact that they are breeding a specific breed. All dogs within that breed are genetically stemming from a small isolated gene pool that created the initial breed and are not "allowed" to bring in new genetic material. (This in no way means that I support designer breeds. On the contrary, they use the world of "pure-breeding" to further manipulate the situation.) Breeders of any particular breed must also deal in some way with the fact that other breeders potentially won't mate their dogs without confirmation show titles. You know, the beauty pageants like Westminster and Crufts? (Mmmh, side note, Jeffrey, the Pekingese, who had to have surgery so he could breath right? Yup, he won Crufts and has no doubt sired and most likely passed on his "unique" deformity, I mean ribbon-winning health.)
All in all, the thing that gets me most, besides all the evidence of why purebred dogs, much as I love mine, have increasing health problems and people continuingly ignoring and disputing the facts, is that there are so many dogs, purebred and otherwise out there, right now, young and old, needing homes besides a gas-chamber and an unmarked grave.
Labels:
brains,
breeding,
dogs,
eugenics,
smoke and mirrors
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)